0.10/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.10/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SlCXqKel1U true 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1200 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 15:30:54 EDT 2021 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.34 % Running portfolio for 120 s 0.12/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.18/0.34 % Number of cores: 8 0.18/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.18/0.34 % Running in HO mode 0.48/0.59 % Total configuration time : 828 0.48/0.59 % Estimated wc time : 983 0.48/0.59 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 122.875 0.50/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 47s 0.50/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 47s 0.50/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 47s 0.50/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 53s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 41s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 24s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 18s 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 35s 0.51/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 53s 17.90/2.88 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh. 17.90/2.88 % running E: timeout 11 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/eprover-ho --pos-ext=all --neg-ext=all /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SlCXqKel1U/e_input1cc9d1 --cpu-limit=9 --auto-schedule -s -p 17.90/2.88 % done 121 iterations in 2.127s 17.90/2.88 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 17.90/2.88 % SZS output start Refutation 17.90/2.88 thf(nat_type, type, nat: $tType). 17.90/2.88 thf(list_a_type, type, list_a: $tType). 17.90/2.88 thf(ord_less_nat_type, type, ord_less_nat: nat > nat > $o). 17.90/2.88 thf(a_type, type, a: $tType). 17.90/2.88 thf(n_type, type, n: nat). 17.90/2.88 thf(listIn1417627087drop_a_type, type, listIn1417627087drop_a: nat > 17.90/2.88 (nat > a) > 17.90/2.88 nat > a). 17.90/2.88 thf(xs_type, type, xs: list_a). 17.90/2.88 thf(ord_less_eq_nat_type, type, ord_less_eq_nat: nat > nat > $o). 17.90/2.88 thf(size_size_list_a_type, type, size_size_list_a: list_a > nat). 17.90/2.88 thf(minus_minus_nat_type, type, minus_minus_nat: nat > nat > nat). 17.90/2.88 thf(drop_a_type, type, drop_a: nat > list_a > list_a). 17.90/2.88 thf(listIn1312259492pend_a_type, type, listIn1312259492pend_a: list_a > 17.90/2.88 (nat > a) > 17.90/2.88 nat > a). 17.90/2.88 thf(f_type, type, f: nat > a). 17.90/2.88 thf(fact_35_i__append__i__drop__eq2, axiom, 17.90/2.88 (![Xs:list_a,N:nat,F:( nat > a )]: 17.90/2.88 ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ ( size_size_list_a @ Xs ) @ N ) => 17.90/2.88 ( ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ N @ ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ Xs @ F ) ) = 17.90/2.88 ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ 17.90/2.88 ( minus_minus_nat @ N @ ( size_size_list_a @ Xs ) ) @ F ) ) ))). 17.90/2.88 thf(zip_derived_cl77, plain, 17.90/2.88 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : list_a]: 17.90/2.88 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : nat]: 17.90/2.88 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : nat > a]: 17.90/2.88 (((ord_less_eq_nat @ 17.90/2.88 (size_size_list_a @ Y0) @ Y1) => 17.90/2.88 (((listIn1417627087drop_a @ Y1 @ 17.90/2.88 (listIn1312259492pend_a @ Y0 @ 17.90/2.88 Y2)) = 17.90/2.88 (listIn1417627087drop_a @ 17.90/2.88 (minus_minus_nat @ Y1 @ 17.90/2.88 (size_size_list_a @ Y0)) @ 17.90/2.88 Y2))))))))))))))), 17.90/2.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_35_i__append__i__drop__eq2])). 17.90/2.88 thf(fact_190_le__less__linear, axiom, 17.90/2.88 (![X:nat,Y:nat]: ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X @ Y ) | ( ord_less_nat @ Y @ X ) ))). 17.90/2.88 thf(zip_derived_cl245, plain, 17.90/2.88 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : nat]: 17.90/2.88 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : nat]: 17.90/2.88 (((ord_less_eq_nat @ Y0 @ Y1) | 17.90/2.88 (ord_less_nat @ Y1 @ Y0)))))))))), 17.90/2.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_190_le__less__linear])). 17.90/2.88 thf(fact_73_less__or__eq__imp__le, axiom, 17.90/2.88 (![M:nat,N:nat]: 17.90/2.88 ( ( ( ord_less_nat @ M @ N ) | ( ( M ) = ( N ) ) ) => 17.90/2.88 ( ord_less_eq_nat @ M @ N ) ))). 17.90/2.88 thf(zip_derived_cl213, plain, 17.90/2.88 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : nat]: 17.90/2.88 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : nat]: 17.90/2.88 (((((ord_less_nat @ Y0 @ Y1) | (((Y0) = (Y1))))) => 17.90/2.88 (ord_less_eq_nat @ Y0 @ Y1)))))))))), 17.90/2.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_73_less__or__eq__imp__le])). 17.90/2.88 thf(fact_33_i__append__i__drop__eq1, axiom, 17.90/2.88 (![N:nat,Xs:list_a,F:( nat > a )]: 17.90/2.88 ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ N @ ( size_size_list_a @ Xs ) ) => 17.90/2.88 ( ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ N @ ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ Xs @ F ) ) = 17.90/2.88 ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ ( drop_a @ N @ Xs ) @ F ) ) ))). 17.90/2.88 thf(zip_derived_cl107, plain, 17.90/2.88 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : nat]: 17.90/2.88 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : list_a]: 17.90/2.88 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : nat > a]: 17.90/2.88 (((ord_less_eq_nat @ Y0 @ 17.90/2.88 (size_size_list_a @ Y1)) => 17.90/2.88 (((listIn1417627087drop_a @ Y0 @ 17.90/2.88 (listIn1312259492pend_a @ Y1 @ 17.90/2.88 Y2)) = 17.90/2.88 (listIn1312259492pend_a @ 17.90/2.88 (drop_a @ Y0 @ Y1) @ Y2))))))))))))))), 17.90/2.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_33_i__append__i__drop__eq1])). 17.90/2.88 thf(conj_0, conjecture, 17.90/2.88 (( ( ~( ord_less_nat @ n @ ( size_size_list_a @ xs ) ) ) => 17.90/2.88 ( ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f ) ) = 17.90/2.88 ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ 17.90/2.88 ( minus_minus_nat @ n @ ( size_size_list_a @ xs ) ) @ f ) ) ) & 17.90/2.88 ( ( ord_less_nat @ n @ ( size_size_list_a @ xs ) ) => 17.90/2.88 ( ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f ) ) = 17.90/2.88 ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ ( drop_a @ n @ xs ) @ f ) ) ))). 17.90/2.88 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, 17.90/2.88 (~( ( ( ~( ord_less_nat @ n @ ( size_size_list_a @ xs ) ) ) => 17.90/2.88 ( ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f ) ) = 17.90/2.88 ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ 17.90/2.88 ( minus_minus_nat @ n @ ( size_size_list_a @ xs ) ) @ f ) ) ) & 17.90/2.88 ( ( ord_less_nat @ n @ ( size_size_list_a @ xs ) ) => 17.90/2.88 ( ( listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f ) ) = 17.90/2.88 ( listIn1312259492pend_a @ ( drop_a @ n @ xs ) @ f ) ) ) )), 17.90/2.88 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [conj_0])). 17.90/2.88 thf(zip_derived_cl205, plain, 17.90/2.88 (~ (((((((~) @ (ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)))) => 17.90/2.88 (((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ 17.90/2.88 (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f)) = (listIn1417627087drop_a @ 17.90/2.88 (minus_minus_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)) @ f))))) & 17.90/2.88 (((ord_less_nat @ n @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)) => 17.90/2.88 (((listIn1417627087drop_a @ n @ 17.90/2.88 (listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f)) = (listIn1312259492pend_a @ 17.90/2.88 (drop_a @ n @ xs) @ f)))))))), 17.90/2.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 17.90/2.88 thf(zip_derived_cl2137, plain, ($false), 17.90/2.88 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], 17.90/2.88 [zip_derived_cl77, zip_derived_cl245, zip_derived_cl213, 17.90/2.88 zip_derived_cl107, zip_derived_cl205])). 17.90/2.88 17.90/2.88 % SZS output end Refutation 17.90/2.88 17.90/2.88 17.90/2.88 % Terminating... 17.90/2.92 % Runner terminated. 17.90/2.95 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 17.90/2.95 EOF